By Johnathan Paoli

President Cyril Ramaphosa has removed Nobuhle Nkabane as Minister of Higher Education and Training amid mounting controversy over politically connected appointments to Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) boards.

The president has swiftly filled the vacancy by appointing deputy minister Buti Manamela as the new minister, and former ZwaZul-Natal premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube in his old position as deputy minister.

The changes were confirmed by the Presidency in a statement issued late Monday evening, citing Section 91(2) and Section 93(b) of the Constitution as the basis for the appointments.

Manamela, a long-serving member of the executive, had been Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training since 2014.

His elevation to the ministerial position marks a continuity of leadership, but also signals Ramaphosa’s attempt to restore stability and credibility in a portfolio crucial to tackling youth unemployment, skills shortages and institutional dysfunction in the post-school education system.

Manamela is a well-known figure in the education and youth development sectors, with a political career rooted in the Young Communist League and the African National Congress.

His appointment is being viewed as a logical progression following years of experience within the department, during which he oversaw key initiatives in TVET college development, student funding and SETA reform.

Manamela’s familiarity with policy processes and longstanding relationships with key education stakeholders are expected to ease the transition and facilitate continuity in programmes aimed at modernising the sector.

Section 93(b) of the Constitution allows the president to appoint up to two deputy ministers from outside the National Assembly.

The presidency said that Dube-Ncube brought a wealth of experience to the position.

She previously served as MEC for cooperative governance and traditional affairs in KwaZulu-Natal and was most recently the premier of the province, the first woman to hold that office.

Known for her administrative acumen and strong leadership record, Dube-Ncube’s appointment is being welcomed as an injection of new energy into the department.

The reshuffle follows months of tension and criticism directed at Nkabane.

Her tenure had become increasingly untenable after revelations surfaced that several SETA board chairpersons appointed under her leadership were either politically connected or held positions within her department, raising serious concerns about transparency and governance.

The crisis peaked when Nkabane failed to appear at two successive meetings of Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Higher Education, where she had been expected to explain the SETA appointments.

Her absence drew sharp rebuke from opposition parties and civil society alike.

She was scheduled to appear on Tuesday before the committee to account for the controversial process, a meeting that is now in doubt following her dismissal.

In a statement released shortly after her removal, Nkabane confirmed her exit and expressed gratitude to Ramaphosa for the opportunity to serve in Cabinet.

“It was a privilege to lead such a crucial portfolio and I remain committed to the service of South Africans,” she said.

The Democratic Alliance (DA) welcomed the decision to remove Nkabane, with national spokesperson and MP Karabo Khakhau, who had earlier in the day renewed calls for her dismissal, citing poor leadership and alleged cadre deployment in SETA governance.

“To the Republic and its people, we remain committed. What a fight!” she said on X.

There is uncertainty over whether Manamela will attend the higher education committee meeting in her place, however, despite the removal of her executive position, Nkabane remains an MP and is potentially liable to the Joint Committee on Ethics and Members’ Interests.

INSIDE EDUCATION

By Johnathan Paoli

In a stirring celebration of Mandela Day, London mayor Sadiq Khan has reaffirmed the powerful role of sport in social upliftment and cross-continental cooperation, amid trade missions to Nigeria, Ghana and South Africa.

Khan visited Villagers FC in Claremont, Cape Town, where he engaged with young athletes from the Atlas Foundation South Africa, referencing the iconic image of Mandela in a Springbok jersey during the 1995 Rugby World Cup final as a moment that symbolised a fractured nation beginning to heal.

“Sport has the power to bring people together. Teamwork, leadership, respect, these are values learned on the sports field. They’re also values that prevent young people from being pulled into crime and gangs,” Khan said.

Khan, himself a former human rights lawyer, described his experience as “deeply humbling” and emotionally resonant.

“Nelson Mandela’s vision of equal rights and justice wasn’t just for South Africa. It was a vision for all of us, everywhere,” he said, recalling the powerful impact Mandela had on the UK, especially during his imprisonment.

The mayor’s remarks at Villagers FC linked the legacy of Mandela with the transformational power of sport, particularly for young people facing structural inequality, social exclusion, and risk of crime.

He highlighted the achievements of the Atlas Foundation SA, the local chapter of the UK-based foundation, for its work in empowering youth in under-resourced communities through rugby and life-skills training.

To that end, Khan used the occasion to announce a significant £1.4 million investment into London’s own grassroots sport programmes.

The funds, delivered through the Go! London initiative, the city’s largest ever community sports fund, will support youth development, encourage active lifestyles and help reduce crime in vulnerable communities.

The Atlas Foundation will be a key partner in these efforts in the UK, expanding its model from South Africa to London.

Khan’s visit to Villagers FC comes just months after Prince William toured the Atlas Foundation’s programmes in Ocean View and Masiphumelele, underlining the growing international attention on grassroots sport as a tool for development.

The mayor also used his time in Cape Town to meet with Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis and engage in trade discussions focused on tech, fintech, and sustainability.

He praised Cape Town’s thriving start-up culture and expressed interest in building long-term partnerships between London and Cape Town-based businesses.

“As part of our Grow London Global initiative, we’re inviting South African businesses to expand into London. Whether you’re a start-up or scaling up, we’re here to offer support, funding, and connections. We don’t want to act as patrons, but as equal partners,” Khan said.

In summarising his African visit, Khan reflected on the interconnectedness of social justice, sport, and trade.

The mayor said his visit reinforced the symbolic and practical bridges being built between South Africa and the UK, grounded in a shared belief in equality, opportunity, and the transformative power of sport.

INSIDE POLITICS

By Johnathan Paoli

With just days to go before the Gauteng education department opens its 2026 online admissions system, MEC Matome Chiloane has urged parents and guardians to prepare thoroughly and comply with all steps of the process to ensure successful placement of their children in Grade 1 and Grade 8 at public schools.

Briefing the media, Chiloane confirmed that the application window opens on Thursday at 8am and closes on 29 August at midnight, with no late applications to be accepted.

“This process is strictly for Grade 1 and Grade 8 admissions. There is no automatic placement for children currently in Grade R or Grade 7, you must apply online during the window,” Chiloane said.

Applications must be submitted through the department’s admissions portal which will be inactive until the official opening time and will close automatically at the end of the application period.

All parents, regardless of past applications, must create new login credentials for 2026.

The application process consists of five steps: namely to register parent or guardian details; home address; learner details; apply to five schools; and submit supporting documents within seven working days.

“Selecting only one or two schools is risky, choosing five improves the likelihood of your child being placed at one of your preferred options,” Chiloane advised.

The supporting documents to be submitted include a certified copy of parent/guardian ID or passport; child’s birth certificate or passport; legal permits if applicable (asylum, refugee, residence, work, or study); proof of home and/or work address; Grade 7 report card (for Grade 8 applicants); and clinic card or immunisation record (for Grade 1 applicants).

Parents may upload these documents online or submit them physically to each selected school.

However, only one submission method is allowed per application.

“If you choose five schools and submit physically, you must submit your documents at all five schools,” said Chiloane.

The MEC emphasised that accurate personal information and a reliable cellphone number were vital for communication throughout the application process.

Inaccurate details or mismatched documents will result in the application being marked as incomplete, and such applications will not be considered for placement.

Chiloane confirmed that the system used verified home addresses to assign feeder zone schools.

Thus, proof of residence is the most important document in the application.

For homeowners, a certified municipal bill (not older than three months) in the parent’s name with the full physical address is required.

For tenants, a copy of the landlord’s municipal bill, a signed lease agreement, a recent rental payment slip and a utility or bank statement in the applicant’s name reflecting the same address must be submitted.

For those living in family homes, a municipal bill in the homeowner’s name and the parent’s ID are required, along with an account in the parent’s name showing the same address.

Affidavits and “offers to purchase” will not be accepted.

To curb fraudulent address use, schools are authorised to verify physical addresses, with full support from the department.

Parents applying for Grade 1 must indicate their preferred language of learning and teaching from South Africa’s 11 official languages. The system will match this with schools offering that language.

For Grade 8, the learner’s Grade 7 home language, as reflected on their report card, will be used to identify suitable schools.

Placement will be determined considering the home address within the feeder zone; sibling at the school or feeder school linkage; work address within the feeder zone; home address within a 30km radius and home address beyond 30km.

Chiloane reiterated that completing the application did not guarantee placement at the first-choice school, but successful applicants would be placed at one of their selected schools based on these criteria.

To assist families without internet access or digital literacy, the department has established 81 walk-In centres, 15 district offices and support desks at all public schools across Gauteng. These will be open throughout the application period.

The Democratic Alliance Gauteng education spokesperson Sergio Isa Dos Santos, criticised the department’s silence on the details of the walk-in centres, saying it was creating “unnecessary anxiety” for parents.

“This lack of transparency is unacceptable. The department must urgently publish the full list of walk-in centres and their operating hours before the system opens,” Dos Santos said on Monday.

The DA has submitted official questions requesting centre locations, citing the chaos of last year’s admissions when over 6,000 learners were placed late due to system failures.

Responding to media queries, department spokesperson Steve Mabona confirmed to Inside Education that the list would be uploaded, but did not give a specific date.

In the meantime, Chiloane has encouraged parents to prepare all documentation now, ensure all information is correct, and avoid using fraudulent addresses, which disadvantage legitimate applicants.

He also issued a stern warning against scammers claiming to offer guaranteed placements for a fee.

INSIDE EDUCATION

By Anthea Adams, Charlene Geduld- Van Wyk, Patricia Muhoro, and Sandra Williams

Most universities and colleges have formal and informal programmes and initiatives to support student and staff development. Their goal is to create learning experiences that help students succeed academically.

Typically, academic development practitioners design and run these programmes. They are usually academics themselves. To help students, they use tools like data analytics to design tutoring and mentoring programmes. For staff, development might include formal courses, webinars, workshops and seminars. Education researchers Anthea Adams, Sandra Williams, Patricia Muhuro and Charlene Van Wyk-Geduld reflect on their recent paper on academic development in South African higher education.

What is the role of academic development in South African higher education?

It started in the early 1980s when black students were first allowed to register at universities that had previously been reserved for white students.

After 1994 when South Africa became a democracy, the main aim of academic development was to help transform society by giving black students better opportunities to succeed at university.

Research on whether these efforts were making a difference in improving student learning, and our reflections, show a mismatch between what academic development is supposed to achieve and how it is being carried out in practice.

What is the mismatch between goals and practices?

Academic development has come a long way, mainly thanks to government support and funding. There is evidence of this in research and annual progress reports submitted to the Department of Higher Education and Training. This evidence clearly shows the positive impact of academic development efforts over the years.

But even with these strides, we can’t ignore a major concern: many black students drop out of university or do not progress with their studies as expected. This tells us that there’s a serious disconnect between what academic development aims to achieve and its actual practices.

One of the biggest red flags is the ongoing gap in graduation rates across different population groups. For example, the Council on Higher Education’s 2022 review of higher education highlighted that in 2018, white students were six percentage points more likely to complete their studies than black students.

What’s also worrying is that South African curricula and learning approaches are not yet relevant to diverse learning contexts. Students, academic staff and professional organisations like the Higher Education Learning and Teaching Association of Southern Africa have all said that academic development practices may not sufficiently address the academic realities of the majority of students.

What lessons can we learn?

We propose that academic development work should be based on research that can genuinely support all students’ success.

A number of scholars have argued that the quality of current research on academic development work contributes to the mismatch between its goals and actual practices. The research is not yet as theoretical, scholarly and critical as it needs to be to help us fully understand and improve academic development work.

This critique helps us understand why academic development research often feels limited to one specific context. This is particularly true of research that looks into why some students are dropping out or struggling to complete their studies.
This kind of research doesn’t offer insights that help practitioners and academics think more broadly about how to apply the findings in different learning contexts.

Valuable work is being done by both veteran and less experienced academic development practitioners. Their efforts have influenced academic development work as we know it today. But we should respond to the observation that most academic development work is still, in practice, limited to one context.

What is the way forward?

Less experienced academic development practitioners and scholars may find it daunting to produce research rich in theory. Therefore, we propose working together in communities of practice to build networks and benefit from reciprocal mentorship opportunities.

Mentors can be peers or seasoned academic development practitioners and researchers. They can help each other unpack what it means to produce rigorous research based on real-life teaching and learning contexts.

Working alongside each other and sharing knowledge and expertise can be fulfilling. It can also be the catalyst for building theory that will advance an understanding of academic development work. Opportunities to form peer networks help academics develop confidence and competence as teachers and scholars.

This kind of work can happen naturally as long as the context is supportive. However, we recognise opportunities for both formal and informal reciprocal mentoring relationships. This is based on our reflections on our teaching experiences and engagements in postgraduate diplomas in higher education.

Several scholars support the proposal for national directives to develop academics as university teachers and scholars. Professional development initiatives, such as postgraduate diplomas, can be conducive learning spaces where academics can engage in the scholarship of teaching and learning.

In other words, supported by experienced facilitators, academics can use research and evidence to interrogate how they teach and how students learn.

Professional development initiatives are not a panacea for the mismatch between academic development goals and actual practices. However, they can be a place where academics help each other to build theory in academic development. Only then, by working together, can academics respond to challenges casting a shadow on academic development work.

Anthea Adams is a Lecturer: Academic Staff Development, Rhodes University, Charlene Geduld- Van Wyk is a Senior Instructor Emergency Health, Central University of Technology, Patricia Muhuro is a Senior Consultant Teaching and Learning, University of Fort Hare, and Sandra Williams is a Lecturer in Law in the Marketing Department in the Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology.

The Conversation

By Lungile Ntimba

The University of Cape Town’s Senate Teaching and Learning Committee has endorsed a new Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education Framework to guide the responsible and ethical use of AI technologies in teaching and learning.

Prof.  Brandon Collier-Reed, who is a deputy vice-chancellor in teaching and learning, said the recent decision was driven by the growing integration of AI tools into everyday academic and professional life.

“Staff and students are using tools such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini in innovative and productive ways; while at other times these technologies present significant challenges, requiring us to rethink teaching pedagogies, assessment practices and the fundamentals of what a university experience should be and what our qualifications should signify in a changing world,” Collier-Reed said in a statement.

The framework, which focuses primarily on generative AI, provides overarching principles for ethical and responsible use.

It also promotes three core pillars for engagement, including promoting AI literacy among staff and students, ensuring integrity in assessment practices, and investing in AI-enabled innovations in teaching, learning, and curriculum design.

According to Collier-Reed, these pillars served as a roadmap for short- and medium-term activities, while clarifying the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders involved in implementing the framework. 

“Responding to AI in teaching and learning will require the commitment of the entire teaching and learning community as we come together to shape our future with intention and integrity,” he said.

He added that the endorsement followed an extensive engagement process involving faculties, support departments, student representatives and the university’s AI Initiative. 

“Some key messages from the consultations were to foreground academic integrity practices, ensure equity for staff and students in accessing AI technologies in teaching and learning, and promote staff and student AI literacies and capabilities.”

In a related development, Collier-Reed said the Senate Teaching and Learning Committee had also agreed to discontinue the use of Turnitin AI Score, an automated detection tool that flagged potentially AI-generated content in student submissions.

“AI detection tools are widely considered to be unreliable and can produce both false positives and false negatives. The continued use of such scores risks compromising student trust and academic fairness.”

This feature in plagiarism checker Turnitin would no longer be available at UCT from 1 October 2025.

INSIDE EDUCATION

By Johnathan Paoli

Higher Education and Training Minister Nobuhle Nkabane has reaffirmed her department’s commitment to transforming the Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) sector through strategic digital skills initiatives, partnerships and labour-aligned training programmes.

Speaking in conversation with former University of Cape Town Vice-Chancellor Professor Mamokgethi Phakeng, Nkabane highlighted several critical efforts to modernise the sector and address the country’s persistent youth unemployment crisis.

The minister was particularly enthusiastic about the partnership with NetCampus and Microsoft under a presidential initiative to build demand-led digital skills.

“We are excited to partner with NetCampus in this programme, which is one of the president’s priorities in post-school education and training. We recognise the severe skills mismatch in the country and are working to produce graduates that match the demands of our economy,” Nkabane said.

The programme stems from the Business-Government Partnership on Employment and Co-Funding, signed in September 2023 under the leadership of President Cyril Ramaphosa.

It aims to boost economic growth through digital skills development and job placement, coordinated by the Presidency’s Project Management Unit and Business Unity South Africa.

Nkabane revealed that introductory artificial intelligence (AI) courses have already been delivered to principals, deputy principals and senior managers at TVET campuses.

“But this is only the beginning,” she stressed. “We want this programme to reach students on the ground and ensure they leave with recognised certifications that support their employability or business ventures.”

She argued that expanding access alone was insufficient.

“We need to strike a balance between access and success. Training for the sake of training is not impactful, it must lead to meaningful pathways into work or entrepreneurship,” she said.

A cornerstone of Nkabane’s strategy is repurposing TVET colleges into Centres of Specialisation, offering high-impact, future-oriented courses in areas like robotics, welding, mechanical engineering, drone technology and cybersecurity.

She said these centres were being aligned with the country’s labour market intelligence systems and industrial needs.

“TVETs must produce graduates who are ready to be absorbed into the workforce. Our interventions are aimed at deliberately growing the sectors where young people can actively participate in the economy, especially the small business and informal sectors,” Nkabane said.

With approximately 3.8 million young South Africans not in education, employment, or training, the department’s efforts are targeted at drawing these youth into productive and future-ready learning environments.

“When these opportunities are offered, we want young people to come on board so we can thrive together,” she urged.

The minister also underscored a coordinated national approach through the newly established Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) on digital skills and employment.

Chaired by the Presidency, the IMC includes Nkabane herself, as well as ministers from Employment and Labour, Small Business, Communications, and the Industrial Development Corporation.

“This shows our commitment to tackling digital transformation from all angles, not in silos,” she said.

To ensure the relevance and credibility of TVET training, the Manufacturing, Engineering and Related Services Sector Education Training Authority has developed more than 50 new occupational qualifications in collaboration with industry and the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations.

These qualifications span data science, systems development, robotics engineering, drone operation, cybersecurity and cloud computing.

“These programmes are not just relevant, they are essential. They reflect the future of work and the kinds of careers young South Africans must be prepared for,” said Nkabane.

Despite her progressive agenda, Nkabane has come under fire in recent weeks over the controversial appointment of Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) board chairpersons.

Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training rejected her written apology after she failed to appear before them on Friday, citing prior commitments.

She explained that she had been scheduled to travel abroad but, after the trip was cancelled due to lack of presidential approval, she committed to attending a gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) event instead.

The controversy erupted after allegations that some SETA board appointees were politically connected or were officials from within her own department.

The committee is expected to press her on these appointments on Tuesday.

While Nkabane’s digital skills push signals a transformative vision for the TVET and post-school education sector, the backlash over the SETA board saga underscores the complex political and administrative terrain she must navigate.

With youth unemployment still stubbornly high and public confidence in government-led programmes under strain, her ability to implement these changes with credibility and accountability remains under scrutiny.

Still, the minister is resolute about the youth, describing the department’s mission as not just to train, but to empower, employ and elevate South Africa’s youth.

INSIDE EDUCATION

By Amanda Kay Montoya

Back in high school chemistry, I remember waiting with my bench partner for crystals to form on our stick in the cup of blue solution. Other groups around us jumped with joy when their crystals formed, but my group just waited. When the bell rang, everyone left but me. My teacher came over, picked up an unopened bag on the counter and told me, “Crystals can’t grow if the salt is not in the solution.”

To me, this was how science worked: What you expect to happen is clear and concrete. And if it doesn’t happen, you’ve done something wrong.

If only it were that simple.

It took me many years to realize that science is not just some series of activities where you know what will happen at the end. Instead, science is about discovering and generating new knowledge.

Now, I’m a psychologist studying how scientists do science. How do new methods and tools get adopted? How do changes happen in scientific fields, and what hinders changes in the way we do science?

One practice that has fascinated me for many years is replication research, where a research group tries to redo a previous study. Like with the crystals, getting the same result from different teams doesn’t always happen, and when you’re on the team whose crystals don’t grow, you don’t know if the study didn’t work because the theory is wrong, or whether you forgot to put the salt in the solution.

A May 2025 executive order by President Donald Trump emphasized the “reproducibility crisis” in science. While replicability and reproducibility may sound similar, they’re distinct.

Reproducibility is the ability to use the same data and methods from a study and reproduce the result. In my editorial role at the journal Psychological Science, I conduct computational reproducibility checks where we take the reported data and check that all the results in the paper can be reproduced independently.

But we’re not running the study over again, or collecting new data. While reproducibility is important, research that is incorrect, fallible and sometimes harmful can still be reproducible.

By contrast, replication is when an independent team repeats the same process, including collecting new data, to see if they get the same results. When research replicates, the team can be more confident that the results are not a fluke or an error.

The “replication crisis,” a term coined in psychology in the early 2010s, has spread to many fields, including biology, economics, medicine and computer science. Failures to replicate high-profile studies concern many scientists in these fields.

Why replicate?

Replicability is a core scientific value: Researchers want to be able to find the same result again and again. Many important findings are not published until they are independently replicated.

In research, chance findings can occur. Imagine if one person flipped a coin 10 times and got two heads, then told the world that “coins have a 20% chance of coming up heads.” Even though this is an unlikely outcome – about 4% – it’s possible.

Replications can correct these chance outcomes, as well as scientific errors, to ensure science is self-correcting.

For example, in the search for the Higgs boson, two research centers at CERN, the European Council for Nuclear Research, ATLAS and CMS, independently replicated the detection of a particle with a large unique mass, leading to the 2013 Nobel Prize in physics.

The initial measurements from the two centers actually estimated the mass of the particle as slightly different. So while the two centers didn’t find identical results, the teams evaluated them and determined they were close enough. This variability is a natural part of the scientific process. Just because results are not identical does not mean they are not reliable.

Research centers like CERN have replication built into their process, but this is not feasible for all research. For projects that are relatively low cost, the original team will often replicate their work prior to publication – but doing so does not guarantee that an independent team could get the same results.

When projects are costly, urgent or time-specific, independently replicating them prior to disseminating results is often not feasible. Remember when people across the country were waiting for a COVID-19 vaccine?

The initial Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine took 13 months from the start of the trial to authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. The results of the initial study were so clear and convincing that a replication would have unnecessarily delayed getting the vaccine out to the public and slowing the spread of disease.

Since not every study can be replicated prior to publication, it’s important to conduct replications after studies are published. Replications help scientists understand how well research processes are working, identify errors and self-correct. So what’s the process of conducting a replication?

The replication process

Researchers could independently replicate the work of other teams, like at CERN. And that does happen. But when there are only two studies – the original and the replication – it’s hard to know what to do when they disagree. For that reason, large multigroup teams often conduct replications where they are all replicating the same study.

Alternatively, if the purpose is to estimate the replicability of a body of research – for example, cancer biology – each team might replicate a different study, and the focus is on the percentage of studies that replicate across many studies.

These large-scale replication projects have arisen around the world and include ManyLabs, ManyBabies, Psychological Accelerator and others.

Replicators start by learning as much as possible about how the original study was conducted. They can collect details about the study from reading the published paper, discussing the work with its original authors and consulting online materials.

The replicators want to know how the participants were recruited, how the data was collected and using what tools, and how the data was analyzed.

But sometimes, studies may leave out important details, like the questions participants were asked or the brand of equipment used. Replicators have to make these difficult decisions themselves, which can affect the outcome.

Replicators also often explicitly change details of the study. For example, many replication studies are conducted with larger samples – more participants – than the original study, to ensure the results are reliable.

Registration and publication

Sadly, replication research is hard to publish: Only 3% of papers in psychology, less than 1% in education and 1.2% in marketing are replications.

If the original study replicates, journals may reject the paper because there is no “new insight.” If it doesn’t replicate, journals may reject the paper because they assume the replicators made a mistake – remember the salt crystals.

Because of these issues, replicators often use registration to strengthen their claims. A preregistration is a public document describing the plan for the study. It is time-stamped to before the study is conducted.

This type of document improves transparency by making changes in the plan detectable to reviewers. Registered reports take this a step further, where the research plan is subject to peer review before conducting the study.

If the journal approves the registration, they commit to publishing the results of the study regardless of the results. Registered reports are ideal for replication research because the reviewers don’t know the results when the journal commits to publishing the paper, and whether the study replicates or not won’t affect whether it gets published.

About 58% of registered reports in psychology are replication studies.

Replication research often uses the highest standards of research practice: large samples and registration. While not all replication research is required to use these practices, those that do contribute greatly to our confidence in scientific results.

Replication research is a useful thermometer to understand if scientific processes are working as intended. Active discussion of the replicability crisis, in both scientific and political spaces, suggests to many researchers that there is room for growth. While no field would expect a replication rate of 100%, new processes among scientists aim to improve the rates from those in the past.

Amanda Kay Montoya is an Associate Professor of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.

The Conversation

By Lungile Ntimba

A groundbreaking Centre for Advanced Training and Innovative Research (CATIR), which is aimed at strengthening South Africa’s scientific capacity and equipping young researchers with advanced skills, was launched in Pretoria.

The new facility will function as a specialised training hub, offering practical, hands-on experience in advanced molecular techniques and laboratory management, bridging the gap between academic theory and real-world scientific application.

Once fully operational, CATIR will have the capacity to train up to 160 students annually, with courses lasting five weeks. The first cohort of 20 students is expected to complete training before the end of the year.

The centre was established through a collaborative partnership involving the Science, Technology and Innovation Department, the SA Medical Research Council and Thermo Fisher Scientific, a United States-based company specialising in clinical and life sciences research. 

Speaking at the launch, Science, Technology and Innovation Deputy Minister Nomalungelo Gina said the centre was an important milestone in the country’s journey towards a knowledge-based economy.

“By investing in this centre, we are investing in the future of South African science, empowering our researchers, nurturing young talent and fostering an environment where innovation can thrive,” said Gina.

“This launch is especially significant as it aligns with our Decadal Plan 2022–2032, which aims to build a transformed, inclusive and coherent National System of Innovation that responds to the needs of society and the economy.”

Gina said SAMRC was a trusted project management partner, citing its proven track record in implementing capacity-building programmes that have benefited young scientists from historically under-resourced universities, including Zululand, Limpopo, Venda and Walter Sisulu.

SAMRC president and CEO Ntobeko Ntusi underscored the importance of investing in infrastructure and expertise that would assist in addressing local gaps in critical scientific fields.

“The Covid-19 pandemic taught us that we needed to do more to build skills in clinical and molecular testing to improve the resilience of our health system against the diseases of today and tomorrow. 

“The opening of this important new educational facility is a landmark moment in our journey to achieving this important goal,” said Ntusi.

The president of Europe, the Middle East, and Africa at Thermo Fisher Scientific, Urmi Prasad Richardson, highlighted the significance of public-private collaboration in strengthening health systems.

“The opening of the CATIR demonstrates the importance of public-private partnerships in helping to build a more resilient health system in South Africa and underpins our mission to enable our customers to make the world healthier, cleaner, and safer,” she said.

“Alongside the SAMRC, we are proud to be investing our time, resources and knowledge into this important new facility, to meet our shared goal of building locally relevant capabilities and expertise amongst the next generation of South Africa’s scientists.”

INSIDE EDUCATION

By Levy Masiteng

Higher Education and Training Minister Nobuhle Nkabane has reiterated her appeal for a collective commitment in activating the skills revolution.

“We need a collective commitment from government, industry, business, civil society and the young people of this country to ignite a skills revolution,” Nkabane said. 

“Infrastructure alone cannot solve all these challenges.”

She was addressing the annual national student leadership induction programme for Student Representative Councils and the South African Technical and Vocational Education and Training Student Association (SATVETSA) at Buffalo City TVET College.

She praised SATVETSA’s robust and mature leadership, assuring them of full support from the department and the ministry. 

Nkabane also commended SATVETSA’s non-negotiable position on 50/50 gender parity and its efforts to tackle gender-based violence on college campuses.

“Our institutions should work together with student leaders in developing and implementing new policies and procedures that are aimed to better address sexual misconduct, intimidation, violence and promote programmes that will reduce gender-based violence in our campuses,” she said. 

The event was aimed at providing student leaders with a platform to share their lived experiences and improve teaching and learning programmes. 

The minister highlighted the importance of collective commitment to addressing challenges in the TVET sector and empowering student leaders to drive positive change.

INSIDE EDUCATION

By Johnathan Paoli

Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube marked Nelson Mandela International Day with a dual event in Mpumalanga focusing on school infrastructure improvement and early childhood development (ECD) registration.

In a return to Boschrand Primary School in White River following a visit earlier this year, Gwarube presided over the official handover of a brand-new classroom block, built through the Classrooms4Hope initiative in partnership with Mozambique‘s Pipeline Investments Company, Ride4Hope and the Nelson Mandela Foundation.

“When I first visited Boschrand in January, up to four learners were sharing a desk. Today, because of collaboration between government and our corporate partners, we hand over fully furnished classrooms that ensure a dignified and effective learning environment for all 1400 learners,” Gwarube said.

The event highlighted the crucial role of public-private partnerships in addressing infrastructure backlogs in underserved schools.

The new classrooms included attached storage facilities and furniture, directly addressing the overcrowding that had particularly impacted Grade R learners.

The project forms part of broader efforts to tackle infrastructure deficits in rural and township schools across South Africa.

Quoting Nelson Mandela, Gwarube said: “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way in which it treats its children.”

She emphasised that despite budgetary constraints in the basic education sector, “our commitment to providing every South African child with access to quality education remains steadfast”.

Learners, parents, teachers and local officials gathered to celebrate as the keys to the new classrooms were officially handed over.

The moment marked the culmination of months of coordinated effort and a shared belief in education as a vehicle for social upliftment.

Gwarube underlined the transformative potential of tripartite partnerships.

“When government, civil society and the private sector work together with shared purpose, we can restore dignity, hope and opportunity through education,” she said.

Following the handover, Gwarube travelled to Early Bird Daycare in KwaMsholozi, where she hosted a lively and informative Bana Pele ECD Registration Clinic in collaboration with Takalani Sesame.

Children, educators and parents were treated to appearances by the programme’s iconic muppet characters and an interactive play zone.

The event aimed to promote awareness about the importance of ECD while driving formal registration of ECD centres nationwide.

“We want every child in South Africa to have a strong start, emotionally, cognitively and socially. And that begins with recognising and supporting the critical role of ECD practitioners,” Gwarube said.

The department’s goal is to register 10,000 ECD centres by the end of 2025.

The registration initiative serves four key functions including formal inclusion of ECD programmes in the national regulatory system, support for compliance with legal and safety standards, access to state subsidies, especially for centres serving low-income families, and efficient processing of registration applications to reduce administrative delays.

The clinic also offered parents and caregivers an opportunity to speak directly with officials about the benefits of formalising their centres and the support available from the department.

Gwarube praised ECD workers for their often unrecognised efforts and committed to ensuring that the department prioritised funding, training and resources for early learning facilities in under-resourced communities.

Meanwhile, Basic Education Deputy Minister Reginah Mhaule led the department’s Mandela Day outreach in Thembisa, Gauteng, visiting two local ECD centres, Silindokuhle Day and After Care Centre and My Angels Day and After Care Centre, alongside deputy director-general Simone Geyer and ward councillor Nomvula Malinga.

The centres received donations of educational toys and books aimed at enhancing cognitive development and sparking curiosity in young learners.

Mhaule began the day by reading books aloud to the children and encouraged staff to incorporate storytelling into their daily routines.

“Reading and listening to stories nurtures imagination, builds language skills, and lays the foundation for a lifelong love of learning. These early interactions with books are not optional, they are essential,” Mhaule said.

Mhaule reaffirmed the department’s broader objective of empowering ECD centres with resources, training and institutional support, stating that every child “deserves a joyful, safe and stimulating start to life”.

Across both provinces, the department hailed its Mandela Day activities as showcasing a coherent and impactful vision of building bridges between sectors, strengthening educational foundations, and honouring the legacy of Madiba through service to South Africa’s most vulnerable citizens, its children.

INSIDE EDUCATION